JJ Abrams Star Trek made its facilities. Not only has made the last film in the series (infinite?) pushing forward the "last frontier" to explore uncharted areas of space, but has reset at will.
This is most obvious after watching the new Star Trek that invade the Italian cinemas (in the contemporary world) from May 8, the action takes place before the original series and tells of the early life of Kirk, Spock, McCoy and all the crew history. The academy, the first positions, the rivalries and so on. etc.. But do not think that Abrams has adjusted to the long history and needs of "consistency" with everything that has already been said. The genius behind Lost has made his Star Trek with its rules, its characters, its traumas and its characters.
The film starts off with a trip back in time to change history, so everything we see is an alternate reality in which things happen that are different from those already done so precisely because of the initial event. It is the alternate reality of JJ Abrams. Welcome.
as no surprise then that more resemble a classic Star Trek movie last longer possesses the characteristics that made him famous Lost: suspense, frantic action (it starts at the beginning and will run no more stops!) And a context of mystery and fascination that captivates. The film by JJ Abrams has gone beyond all expectations, even farther than we hoped when, in November, the author had come to Rome to present the exclusive 20 minutes of the film and it was possible to approach him for a few bars.
On that occasion the strangest thing (and then after the movie has proved to be effective!) Was the way in which the director remarked that he wished to please fans of the series with his film: "When we put Enterprise Network in the first picture from the movie someone said that it sucked because the engines were too big. Now, I know that there are purists but to me the thing that interests me most of all is to make a film ' entertainment and not something for both fans who have something to say. " From
already talking about how you understand it but then he to state: not at all an expert on the series and has accepted this role only because the plot of the movie really intrigued him. That's why so little attention to the fans of the vaunted (but actually is not true, the script was in Roberto Orci, one of the greatest experts trekkiana continuity and the film is full of references and goodies that catch only the lovers). Put in the
JJ Abrams is definitely not easy. What do you think Star Trek has been able to anticipate and then he realized that in our present? "And if now I would say that teleport?" I would say that if it disappears from here I'm sure it reappears on the island: "Ahahahahah! Seriously the communicator science fiction at the time were similar device but now are on the agenda while things like time travel or warp speed are ridiculous now as then. "
time of the interview but no one could imagine the whole movie has many similarities with a lot of things already seen. There are white lit environments such as 2001: A Space Odyssey, there are subway stations that resemble the project and there is a Dharma snowy planet reminiscent of Star Wars but already knew that discussion Abrams get their hands on, "I'm sure I was influenced in some way. For example, the bar of my scenes are like those of Star Wars but in a different background, there was a place alien while my bar is a bar that I go too. But in the end of six Star Wars films were made and I can not think of anything that has not represented: the planets of the snow, the sky, fire, love, etc.. etc.. Three of those films are so full of images and characters, aliens, eyes, blue people ... It 's impossible to do without science fiction approach.
And the final question on what might be the futuristic appeal of something like Star Trek in a country traditionalist and technologically arrancante as our safe Abrams replied: "I think the science of Star Trek has little to do with history or his emotions. There are those who loves and is passionate about the idea or the effects last cliché border, but then what I personally love about Star Trek and I think that makes it different from Star Wars is that it is a sincere vision of our future. Then a most backward country can have perhaps even more interesting because it's still science fiction. "
by WIRED.IT on 08/05/09
This is most obvious after watching the new Star Trek that invade the Italian cinemas (in the contemporary world) from May 8, the action takes place before the original series and tells of the early life of Kirk, Spock, McCoy and all the crew history. The academy, the first positions, the rivalries and so on. etc.. But do not think that Abrams has adjusted to the long history and needs of "consistency" with everything that has already been said. The genius behind Lost has made his Star Trek with its rules, its characters, its traumas and its characters.
The film starts off with a trip back in time to change history, so everything we see is an alternate reality in which things happen that are different from those already done so precisely because of the initial event. It is the alternate reality of JJ Abrams. Welcome.
as no surprise then that more resemble a classic Star Trek movie last longer possesses the characteristics that made him famous Lost: suspense, frantic action (it starts at the beginning and will run no more stops!) And a context of mystery and fascination that captivates. The film by JJ Abrams has gone beyond all expectations, even farther than we hoped when, in November, the author had come to Rome to present the exclusive 20 minutes of the film and it was possible to approach him for a few bars.
On that occasion the strangest thing (and then after the movie has proved to be effective!) Was the way in which the director remarked that he wished to please fans of the series with his film: "When we put Enterprise Network in the first picture from the movie someone said that it sucked because the engines were too big. Now, I know that there are purists but to me the thing that interests me most of all is to make a film ' entertainment and not something for both fans who have something to say. " From
already talking about how you understand it but then he to state: not at all an expert on the series and has accepted this role only because the plot of the movie really intrigued him. That's why so little attention to the fans of the vaunted (but actually is not true, the script was in Roberto Orci, one of the greatest experts trekkiana continuity and the film is full of references and goodies that catch only the lovers). Put in the
JJ Abrams is definitely not easy. What do you think Star Trek has been able to anticipate and then he realized that in our present? "And if now I would say that teleport?" I would say that if it disappears from here I'm sure it reappears on the island: "Ahahahahah! Seriously the communicator science fiction at the time were similar device but now are on the agenda while things like time travel or warp speed are ridiculous now as then. "
time of the interview but no one could imagine the whole movie has many similarities with a lot of things already seen. There are white lit environments such as 2001: A Space Odyssey, there are subway stations that resemble the project and there is a Dharma snowy planet reminiscent of Star Wars but already knew that discussion Abrams get their hands on, "I'm sure I was influenced in some way. For example, the bar of my scenes are like those of Star Wars but in a different background, there was a place alien while my bar is a bar that I go too. But in the end of six Star Wars films were made and I can not think of anything that has not represented: the planets of the snow, the sky, fire, love, etc.. etc.. Three of those films are so full of images and characters, aliens, eyes, blue people ... It 's impossible to do without science fiction approach.
And the final question on what might be the futuristic appeal of something like Star Trek in a country traditionalist and technologically arrancante as our safe Abrams replied: "I think the science of Star Trek has little to do with history or his emotions. There are those who loves and is passionate about the idea or the effects last cliché border, but then what I personally love about Star Trek and I think that makes it different from Star Wars is that it is a sincere vision of our future. Then a most backward country can have perhaps even more interesting because it's still science fiction. "
by WIRED.IT on 08/05/09
0 comments:
Post a Comment